Normativity in a Nonideal World

The context of our research project is provided by the problem of normativity in a nonideal world. Each of the individual subprojects approaches this problematic from a different perspective.

The first and most comprehensive focus of the project is on formulating global norms of justice. Faced with grave global challenges, such as poverty, extreme inequality, transnational violence and environmental problems, International Political Theory must also identify normative foundations of a transnational system capable of orienting and guiding how we deal with such circumstances.

The corresponding approach to norms for the international arena rests on a variety of building blocks: first on a doctrine of human rights, understood as minimal conditions for the legitimacy of social organisations; second on a conception of transnational political order which throws light, among other things, on the legitimacy and authority of international legal systems (including those founded on international law) and examines the conditions for fair participation in transnational governance; and third on a conception of transnational distributive justice which formulates our obligations regarding the global (re-)distribution of opportunities and goods. The goal of the research project is to consolidate these building blocks into a substantive theory of global justice. This also calls for particular attention to the analysis of global relations of responsibility, for instance to the question of how arguments concerning justice can be distinguished from other moral arguments in determining relations of responsibility between individuals and groups.

A second focus is constituted by fundamental methodological questions concerning the relation between morality and politics, in particular concerning the application of normative theories to nonideal conditions. The tensions between realism and utopianism, to which normative political theory is always susceptible, are especially pronounced in the field of International Political Theory. Against this background it becomes particularly urgent to enquire whether the primary role of theories of justice is to formulate principles whose application would bring about completely just relations, or whether our primary concern should be to develop more realistic theories of justice which are capable of orienting political actors because they not only identify the conditions which are actually achievable (in collaboration with the social sciences) but also gauge their relative merits by standards of justice. An additional task is to clarify the relations between these two approaches to normative political philosophy. We will attempt to throw light on these methodological questions concerning the relation to practice and the applicability of theories of justice in close collaboration with the Centre for Advanced Studies 'Justitia Amplificata'.

A third focus lies on the analysis of normativity in general, specifically of normativity in the moral and political domain. What constitutes the distinctive binding character of moral and political norms and on what is founded? Here we will examine the connection between genesis and validity as this is asserted, for instance, in the ideal of democratic self-determination.

Read more

Publications in this project:

  • Beck, Valentin (2010): Theorizing Fairtrade from a justice-related standpoint, in: Global Justice: Theory, Practice, Rhetoric, 3 (2010), p. 1-21.
    Details | Link to full text
  • Broszies, Christoph; Hahn, Henning (2010): Globale Gerechtigkeit. Schlüsseltexte zur Debatte zwischen Partikularismus und Kosmopolitismus, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp 2010.
    Details
  • Broszies, Christoph (2010): „Assembling Realistic Utopias: New Paths in the Global Justice Debate“, in: Journal of International Political Theory, Vol.6:2, 2010.
    Details
  • Celikates, Robin (2010): “Die Demokratisierung der Demokratie. Etienne Balibar über die Dialektik von konstituierender und konstituierter Macht”, in: Ulrich Bröckling/Robert Feustel (Hg.): Das Politische denken, Bielefeld: transcript 2010, S. 59-76.
    Details
  • Celikates, Robin (2010): “Habermas: Sprache, Verständigung und sprachliche Gewalt”, in: Hannes Kuch/Steffen Kitty Herrmann (Hg.): Philosophien sprachlicher Gewalt, Weilerswist: Velbrück 2010, S. 272-285.
    Details
  • Celikates, Robin (2010): “Republikanismus zwischen Politik und Recht”, in: Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung, 64 (2010), 1, S. 111-128.
    Details
  • Celikates, Robin (2010): “Ziviler Ungehorsam und radikale Demokratie – konstituierende vs. konstituierte Macht?”, in: Thomas Bedorf/Kurt Röttgers (Hg.): Die Politik und das Politische, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp 2010, S. 274-300.
    Details
  • Gosepath, Stefan (2010): „Sinn der Menschenrechte nach 1945“, in: Gerhard Ernst, Stephan Sellmaier (Hg.), Universelle Menschenrechte und Partikulare Moral, Stuttgart: Kohlhammer 2010, S. 17-32.
    Details
  • Gosepath, Stefan (2009): Grundprinzipien einer gerechten Verteilung materieller Güter, in: Peter Siller, Gerhard Pitz (Hg.), Politik der Gerechtigkeit. Zur praktischen Orientierungskraft eines umkämpften Ideals, Baden-Baden: Nomos 2009, S. 25-40.
    Details
  • Gosepath, Stefan (2009): Sinn der Menschenrechte nach 1945, in: Hans-Jörg Sandkühler (Hg.), Menschenrechte in die Zukunft denken. 60 Jahre Allgemeine Erklärung der Menschenrechte, Baden-Baden: Nomos 2009, S. 35-47.
    Details
  • Schaub, Jörg (2010): "Hat hier jemand gesagt, der Kaiser sei nackt? Eine Verteidigung der Geussschen Kritik an Rawls' idealtheoretischem Ansatz", in: Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 58/3 (2010), pp. 457–477.
    Details
  • Schaub, Jörg (2010): "Ideale und/oder nicht-ideale Theorie – oder weder noch? Ein Literaturbericht zum neuesten Methodenstreit in der politischen Philosophie", in: Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 64/3, pp. 393-409.
    Details

People in this project:

  • Project director / contact
    • Gosepath, Stefan, Univ.-Prof. Dr. phil. | Profile
  • Project members

back to top Print


Latest News