Mittwoch, 12. Januar 2011, 18 Uhr c.t.

Campus Westend, Hörsaalzentrum HZ5

Prof. Thomas M. Scanlon (Harvard University)

Metaphysical Objections to Normative Truth

CV

Thaltomas M. Scanlon is Alford Professor of Natural Religion, Moral Philosophy, and Civil Polity at Harvard University. He received his B.A. from Princeton in 1962 and his Ph.D. from Harvard. In between, he studied for a year at Oxford as a Fulbright Fellow. He taught at Princeton from 1966 before coming to Harvard in 1984. Professor Scanlon’s dissertation and some of his first papers were in mathematical logic, but the bulk of his teaching and writing has been in moral and political philosophy. He has published papers on freedom of expression, the nature of rights, conceptions of welfare, and theories of justice, as well as on foundational questions in moral theory. His teaching in the department has included courses on theories of justice, equality, ethical theory, and practical reasoning. His  book, What We Owe to Each Other, was published by Harvard University Press in 1998; a collection of papers on political theory, The Difficulty of Tolerance, was published by Cambridge University Press in 2003. His most recent book is Moral Dimensions Permissibility, Meaning, Blame, published by Harvard University Press in 2008. Professor Scanlon gave the John Locke Lectures, Being Realistic about Reasons, in Oxford in 2009.

Abstract

The idea that there are irreducibly normative truths about reasons for action, which we can discover by thinking carefully about reasons in the usual way, has been thought to be subject to three kinds of objections: metaphysical, epistemological, and motivational or, as I would prefer to say, practical. Metaphysical objections claim that a belief in irreducibly normative truths would commit us to facts or entities that would be metaphysically odd, incompatible, it is sometimes said, with a scientific view of the world. In this essay I argue that the idea that there are irreducibly normative truths has no problematic metaphysical implications. Explaining why this is so requires an explanation of what „ontological commitment“ comes to. It also requires an explanation of the relation between normative facts and non-normative facts, and how normative facts can depend on („supervene on“) non-normative facts without being reducible to them.


Aktuelles

Rainer Forst zu Corresponding Fellow der British Academy gewählt

Wie die British Academy am 24. Juli bekannt gab, wurde Prof. Rainer Forst als Corresponding Fellow aufgenommen. Jährlich wählt die British Academy herausragende Gelehrte und Wissenschaftler*innen, die sich auf dem Gebiet der Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften international verdient gemacht haben zu Corresponding Fellows. Mehr...

Ringvorlesung "Machtverschiebung durch Algorithmen und KI"


Von Suchmaschinen bis hin zu Predictive Policing - Algorithmen und Künstliche Intelligenz verändern gesellschaftliche Strukturen und ökonomische Geschäftsmodelle. In der Ringvorlesung "Machtverschiebung durch Algorithmen und KI" werden ab dem 11. November 2020 gesellschaftliche Auswirkungen und Optionen rechtlicher Regulierung im Zusammenhabng mit KI diskutiert. Mehr...

Nächste Termine

26. November 2020, 18.00 Uhr

13. FFGI Vortragsreihe: Prof. Dr. Dr. Jan Kizilhan (Duale Hochschule Baden-Württemberg): Zur Psychologie des islamisierten Terrors und ihrer totalitären Ideologie. Mehr...

1. Dezember 2020, 13.00 Uhr

Crisis Talk: Das Klimasystem in der Krise - Politisches Entscheiden in langfristiger Perspektive. Mehr...

3. und 4. Dezember 2020

Online Workshop: Interpreting the Anthropocene. Mehr...

4. Dezember 2020, 16.00 Uhr

Booklaunch within the Postdoctoral Dialogue Series "Norms, Plurality and Critique": Kant's Tribunal of Reason. Legal Metaphor and Normativity in the Critique of Pure Reason. Mehr...

-----------------------------------------

Neueste Medien

Legal effect in computational ‘law’

Prof. Mireille Hildebrandt (Vrije Universiteit Brussel)
Ringvorlesung "Machtverschiebung durch Algorithmen und KI"


„Teilhabe oder Rückschritt?“ – Die Position der Frau in Zeiten von Corona

Prof. Jutta Allmendinger Ph.D. (Präsidentin des Wissenschaftszentrums Berlin für Sozialforschung)
Moderation: Dr. Mechtild M. Jansen (Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung Hessen)
DenkArt „Der normalisierte Ausnahmezustand“


Videoarchiv

Weitere Videoaufzeichnungen finden Sie hier...

Neueste Volltexte

Darrel Moellendorf (2020):

Hope and reasons. Normative Orders Working Paper 02/2020. Mehr...

Kettemann, Matthias (2020):

The Normative Order of the Internet. Normative Orders Working Paper 01/2020. Mehr...