Prof. Dr. Friedrich Kratochwil (2016)

Professor em. für Internationale Beziehungen

Oktober bis November 2016

Praxis: on Acting and Knowing

In Zusammenarbeit mit Prof. Dr. Gunther Hellmann
Friedrich Kratochwil studied philosophy, politics , and classics at Munich and went as a Fulbright grantee to the US where  received a MA from Georgetown University in international relations  and Ph.D. in political science from Princeton University.
He taught at the universities of Maryland, Columbia, Denver and Penn, before returning to Europe in 1995 and becoming chair of international relations at the LMU in Munich and later at the European University Institute in Florence (2003- 2011). He is was visiting professor at Kyung Hee University in Seoul ,  the Central European University in Budapest, and more recently  PUC- Minas Gerais  (Papal University) at Belo Horizonte, Brazil (2014).
He  published widely on international relations, social theory, international organization and international law  and is the author of Rules Norms and Decisions (Cambridge, 1989) and (with Yosef Lapid) coeditor of The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory (1996 ) His latest books, entitled The Puzzles of Politics, and The Status of Law in World Society, were published by Routledge in 2011,  and by Cambridge University Press in 2014.
He was the editor of the European Journal of International Relations (2000-2004) and has served on editorial boards of political science, law and sociology journals in the US, Europe, and Asia.

"This book pursues two objectives: one, to provide an inventory of the ongoing practices in in contemporary politics and two, to offer a more critical engagement with social action instead of approaching it via an “ideal theory”. In other words, it seemed imperative to examine praxis more explicitly as it was first outlined by Aristotle, only to resurface later in Hume’s philosophy of common life and in his historical work, or in the “pragmatist” critique of the last century.”
These two topics are taken up in the chapters 1-6, and in the “second” part of this book (chaps. 8-10) respectively. The latter attempts to develop a more systematic approach to action through a close reading of Hume and some of the pragmatist literature. These two parts of the book, -the first focusing mostly but not exclusively on the existing repertoires of for action in contemporary international relations (and sometimes involving also their genealogy) – and the second, consisting mainly in a critical reflections of what would be entailed for an analysis if we took “action seriously”, are held together by chapter 7. It deals with the problem of historical reflection, which is occasioned by the vagaries of having to act in irreversible time and under conditions of contingency and necessarily incomplete knowledge that define praxis.
Although the implications of this move to link the two areas via “history” and its different modes of “remembering” (and forgetting) rather than via the construction of an “ideal theory” – be that a model of action familiar from rational choice theory or from the Rawlsian “choice behind the veil of ignorance” or the early Habermasian “ideal speech situation” – will become obvious only in the last few chapters It is therefore, not accidental that I take in chapt. 7 Hedley Bull as my guide, even though I am quite critical of some of his arguments about a “classical approach.” I try to re-formulate his position and link it more systematically to both to the Aristotelian tradition of prudence, and to the pragmatist interest in “ordinary language” and conceptual analysis. Only in this way an adequate understanding of praxis seems to be possible, as it provides the reasons for both being critical of the efforts of ideal theory a la Rawls or the early Habermas, and for not falling back on uncritically examined “lessons of history” (as some forms of realism), for limiting the praxis to the unreflective habits, or for discovering in practices the “gluon” for a future social science.
These ideas are followed up in chapter 8 and 9 and 10 which develop the argument further by a close second reading of Hume and his philosophy of “common life” which was intended as an anti-Cartesian manifesto in which the nature of conventions and historical experience provided elements instead of incontrovertible foundations or where in following a certain method true knowledge could be gained. Hume is not only critical of absolute foundations, but also sees the task of “true philosophy” not in claiming a position outside the practical/historical realm but in criticism based on practical experience rather than epistemological or methodological arguments. The result is a plea for a “non-ideal theory” which no longer subjects praxis to inappropriate theoretical standards." (Friedrich Kratochwil)

Veröffentlichungen (Auswahl):
The Status of Law in World Society: Meditations On The Role And Rule Of Law, Cambridge University Press, New York 2014.
The Puzzles of Politics: Inquiries Into the Genesis and Transformation of International Relation Religions, Taylor & Francis, New York 2010.
Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs, Cambridge University Press, New York 1991.

24. und 25. Oktober 2016
Frankfurt Lecture des Exzellenzclusters "Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen"
Weitere Informationen: Hier...


Rainer Forst zu Corresponding Fellow der British Academy gewählt

Wie die British Academy am 24. Juli bekannt gab, wurde Prof. Rainer Forst als Corresponding Fellow aufgenommen. Jährlich wählt die British Academy herausragende Gelehrte und Wissenschaftler*innen, die sich auf dem Gebiet der Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften international verdient gemacht haben zu Corresponding Fellows. Mehr...

Bundesministerin Karliczek gibt Startschuss für das neue Forschungsinstitut Gesellschaftlicher Zusammenhalt

In einer Pressekonferenz hat Bundesministerin Anja Karliczek am 28. Mai 2020 den Startschuss für das neue Forschungsinstitut Gesellschaftlicher Zusammenhalt (FGZ) gegeben. Mit dabei waren Sprecherin Prof. Nicole Deitelhoff (Goethe-Uni, Normative Orders), sowie der Geschäftsführende Sprecher Prof. Matthias Middell (Uni Leipzig) und Sprecher Prof. Olaf Groh-Samberg (Uni Bremen). Nun kann auch das Frankfurter Teilinstitut seine Arbeit aufnehmen. Mehr...

Nächste Termine

8. September 2020, 19.30 Uhr

DenkArt „Der normalisierte Ausnahmezustand“: Prof. Wilhelm Heitmeyer: „Autoritäre Bedrohungen oder liberale Demokratie?“ – Die offene Gesellschaft im Ausnahmezustand. Mehr...

10. September 2020, 12.30 Uhr

Online Book lɔ:ntʃ: Prof. Dr. Dr. Günter Frankenberg: Autoritarismus - Verfassungstheoretische Perspektiven (Suhrkamp 2020). Mehr...


Neueste Medien

Normative Orders Insights

... mit Franziska Fay

Normative Orders Insights

... mit Rainer Forst

Neueste Volltexte

Burchard, Christoph (2019):

Künstliche Intelligenz als Ende des Strafrechts? Zur algorithmischen Transformation der Gesellschaft. Normative Orders Working Paper 02/2019. Mehr...

Kettemann, Matthias (2020):

The Normative Order of the Internet. Normative Orders Working Paper 01/2020. Mehr...