Disagreement, Judgment, and Universality in the Work of Jean-François Lyotard

Dr. Javier Burdman

Laufzeit des Forschungsprojekts: 01/2018 – 12/2019

The project examines the tension between universality and disagreement in the work of Jean-François Lyotard. Lyotard is well known for his diagnosis of a “postmodern condition,” in which a multiplicity of discourses interact without the mediation of a meta-language. Yet the implications of this diagnosis for his conception of politics is often simplistically interpreted as a nihilistic denial of universality, communication, and agreement. My goal is to show that, for Lyotard, universality and disagreement are not mutually exclusive, but essentially intertwined. In order to do so, I will pursue three specific objectives:

1) To compare Lyotard’s conception of disagreement and universality with that of three influential figures in contemporary political theory: Habermas, Laclau, and Rancière.
2) To situate Lyotard’s conception of political judgment, which is influenced by Kant’s judgment of the sublime, within contemporary discussions around this topic, which have focused mostly on Arendt’s reading of Kant’s judgment of the beautiful.
3) To develop a better understanding of Lyotard’s conception of politics in postmodernity, or what I will call a “postmodern politics,” which is based on the preservation and orientation of disagreement, rather than on its overcoming.

My interpretation of Lyotard’s work will be informed by four methodological approaches: 1) Tracing its philosophical influences; 2) Relating it to its political context; 3) Identifying explicit and implicit discussions with other contemporary political theorists; 4) Systematizing the meaning of its central concepts.

The main aims of the project are therefore:

1) To clarify Lyotard’s conception of politics in response to his diagnosis of a “postmodern condition.”
2) To situate Lyotard’s thought within contemporary debates in political theory.
3) To develop a new understanding of the relationship between disagreement and universal judgments in contemporary politics.
By analyzing the tension between social fragmentation and universal political claims, my project contributes to the research on pluralism, social integration, and contemporary crises of legitimacy developed at Normative Orders.

Selected publications related to this project

Burdman, Javier (forthcoming): “Knowledge and the Public World: Arendt on Science, Truth, and Politics,” Constellations (available Early View).
Burdman, Javier (forthcoming): “Between Banality and Radicality: Arendt and Kant on Evil and Responsibility,” European Journal of Political Theory (available OnlineFirst).
Burdman, Javier (2016): “Necessity, Contingency, and the Future of Kant: Review of Catherine Malabou’s Before Tomorrow: Epigenesis and Rationality,” diacritics 44.1, 7-25.


Aktuelles

"Making Crises Visible" - Ausstellung und Rahmenprogramm beginnen im Februar 2020

Der Forschungsverbund "Normative Ordnungen" der Goethe-Universität beteiligt sich von Februar bis Juni 2020 am Rahmenprogramm zum wissenschaftlich-künstlerischen Projekt "Making Crises Visible". Mehr...

DFG fördert Kolleg-Forschungsgruppe „Polyzentrik und Pluralität vormoderner Christentümer“

Eine von der DFG geförderte Kolleg-Forschungsgruppe mit dem Titel  „Polyzentrik und Pluralität vormoderner Christentümer“ richtet ab Oktober 2020 den Blick auf frühere Formen des Christentums. Sprecherinnen sind Prof. Dr. Birgit Emich und Prof. Dr. Dorothea Weltecke, Mitglied des Forschungsverbunds "Normative Ordnungen" der Goethe-Universität. Mehr...

Nächste Termine

31. Januar 2020, 9 Uhr

Workshop: Miteinander reden oder aneinander vorbei? Chancen und Herausforderungen aus der Praxis der Wissenschaftskommunikation. Mehr...

31. Januar 2020, 18 Uhr

Podiumsdiskussion: Kritik der Vernunft oder Vernunft der Kritik? Mehr...

3. Februar 2020, 18.15 Uhr

Interdisziplinäre Vortragsreihe "Evidenz in der Wissenschaft": Prof. Dr. Hartmut Leppin: Hat Jesus eigentlich gelebt? Zur Frage der historischen Evidenz. Mehr...

-----------------------------------------

Neueste Medien

Der Zorn der Moralisten und die Theorie des Ressentiments. Gegenwartsdiagnose mit/gegen Nietzsche

Prof. Dr. Albrecht Koschorke
Vortrag

Jia Zhangkes Gedächtnisprojekt 24 CITY: Vom Umschreiben der Geschichte zu einem Umdenken in der Geschichtsschreibung

Chris Berry
Lecture & Film "Jia Zhangke: Kino der Transformation"

Neueste Volltexte

Burchard, Christoph (2019):

Künstliche Intelligenz als Ende des Strafrechts? Zur algorithmischen Transformation der Gesellschaft. Normative Orders Working Paper 02/2019. Mehr...

Kettemann, Matthias (2019):

Die normative Ordnung der Cyber-Sicherheit: zum Potenzial von Cyber-Sicherheitsnormen. Normative Orders Working Paper 01/2019. Mehr...