20. November 2010, 13.30 Uhr

Panel V: Justice and Peace – Goals or Fragments of International Law?

Introduction:

Klaus Günther

alt

Nobody denies that International Law should contribute to justice and peace, that a just world order will also be a requirement for a global state of peace. Although the law plays a prominent
role in the development of international organisations and international regulations of a globalised world, one can observe that International Law is also becoming more and more fragmented. Different authorities claim direct or indirect legislative power, legal regulations differ from one area to another, private actors and states cooperate or litigate against each other, soft law regulations and intergovernmental agreements are more influential than legally binding norms with courts and sanctions. The panel will address some of the problems resulting from the ambivalent state of international
law: Is a fragmented and pluralistic law perhaps a better tool for ensuring global justice and peace? Or can global justice only be realised within a constitutional framework? Does constitutionalisation make conflicts more or less probable or is it a tool for resolving conflicts?

Lecture 1:

International Law between Fragmentation and Constitutionalisation

Andreas Paulus

Video:

Audio:

This contribution deals with the paradoxical relationship between the two main strands of theories on the current status of international law. On the one hand, the international (dis)order
seems to fragment into different issue areas, with different actors and different standards or even different legal subjects, from investment law to human rights law. On the other hand, a
good deal of German scholarship centres around a theory of the ‘constitutionalisation‘ of international law, referring to the increasing juridification and the development of common principles
and institutions in the international legal order. We will see that fragmentation and constitutionalisation, as responses to globalisation, may well represent two sides of the same coin.

alt

Andreas L. Paulus holds the Chair of Public and International Law at the University of Göttingen. Paulus teaches Public Law, International and European Law, Constitutional History and Legal Philosophy. He is also a tutor (Vertrauensdozent) of the German National Academic Foundation (Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes). In March 2010, he was sworn in as justice of the First Senate of the Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht).

 

Lecture 2:

International Order As an Idea – On Strict Rules and Flexible Principles

Stefan Kadelbach

Video:

Audio:

Since Kant, political philosophy has elaborated on the famous ‘contradiction‘ between the republican organisation of individual and collective
autonomy, on the one hand, and the rule of nonintervention, on the other. In International Law both a categorical prohibition of unjustified use
of force or other coercive means and constitutional principles transferred from the domestic realm into norms between states coexist. The
paper addresses whether or not this coexistence is paradoxical and the shapes assumed by conflicts between both sets of norms.

alt

After studies in Tubingen, Frankfurt and Charlottesville/Va., Stefan Kadelbach took the bar exam in 1988, is doctoral degree in 1991 and his Ph.D. in 1996. Having worked at the universities
of Bremen and Muenster, he was appointed a professor for Public Law at Frankfurt in 2004. His fields of research include the theory of public International Law, human rights as well


Aktuelles

Denken im Widerspruch

Prof. Dr. Rainer Forst, Co-Sprecher des Exzellenzclusters "Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen" zum Gedenken an Theodor W. Adorno aus Anlass seines 50. Todestags. Mehr...

„Noch einmal: Zum Verhältnis von Moralität und Sittlichkeit" - Vortrag von Jürgen Habermas am 19. Juni 2019. Skript und Aufzeichnung verfügbar

Die Meldung zum Vortrag finden Sie: Hier...
Weitere Informationen (Videoaufzeichnung, Skript und Medienecho) finden Sie: Hier...

"The History of Postmetaphysical Philosophy and the Future of Democracy" - Konferenz zu Ehren von Jürgen Habermas

Am 20. und 21. Juni fand am Exzellenzcluster "Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen" die Konferenz "The History of Postmetaphysical Philosophy and the Future of Democracy" statt.
Die Meldung zur Konferenz finden Sie hier...
Das Programm und weitere Informationen finden Sie hier...

Nächste Termine

20. August 2019, 19 Uhr

Goethe Lectures Offenbach: Prof. Dr. Klaus Günther: Wie frei sind wir im digitalen Echoraum? Mehr...

9. September 2019, 11 Uhr

Workshop: Lehrbücher der Zukunft Mehr...

11. und 12. September 2019

Conference: Contextual Thinking in Economics. More...

-----------------------------------------

Neueste Medien

„Die gesellschaftlichen Voraussetzungen des Faschismus dauern fort“ Zur Aktualität Adornos

Podiumsdiskussion

Verzerrt das Kino die KI? Ein Gespräch über Privatheit, IT-Vertrauen und Repräsentation anhand von The Circle

Vinzenz Hediger im Gespräch mit Christoph Burchard
Talking About a Revolution: Rechtswissenschaft und Filmwissenschaft im Gespräch über künstliche Intelligenz und Kino

Neueste Volltexte

Kettemann, Matthias; Kleinwächter, Wolfgang; Senges, Max (2018):

The Time is Right for Europe to Take the Lead in Global Internet Governance. Normative Orders Working Paper 02/2018. Mehr...

Kettemann, Matthias (2019):

Die normative Ordnung der Cyber-Sicherheit: zum Potenzial von Cyber-Sicherheitsnormen. Normative Orders Working Paper 01/2019. Mehr...