Forschungsprogramm

Hier finden Sie in kürze die Forschungsprojekte zur Clusterlaufzeit 2012 -2017.

Hier finden Sie in Kürze die Frorschungsprojekte für die Clusterlaufzeit 2012-2017.

With a thematic focus on the formation of normative orders, the programme explores current conflicts over a just world order and their historical genesis from the perspective of different disciplines in the humanities and social sciences (philosophy, history, political science, legal studies, ethnology, economics, religious studies and sociology). In contrast to functionalist explanatory approaches which always appeal to factors external to norms and have their own scientific justification, the Cluster is concerned with the internal conflicts, processes and procedures involved in the formation of normative orders. Normative orders serve to justify claims to validity and the claims to political authority, and to a particular distribution of goods and life chances, based upon them. They are embedded in justification narratives which emerge within unique historical constellations in response to a specific pressure of problems. For the most part they are handed down, modified, institutionalized and put into practice over long periods of time. At the same time, however, every traditional justification narrative points beyond the facticity of an extant order and thus presents opportunities for criticism, rejection or resistance. It is this performative tension between narratives and claims to justification which renders the conflictual dynamic of the formation and transformation of normative orders intelligible.

The researchers participating in the Cluster of Excellence find their common ground in this internal standpoint. They use it to investigate the formation of normative orders, employing the resources of their own disciplines, while engaging in reflexive communication concerning this shared foundation. Without absolutizing the distinction between internal and external perspectives on the formation of normative orders, one can nevertheless observe in current conflicts how people give immediate expression to their experiences of injustice – with all of the attendant ambivalences, especially when these expressions are quickly broadcast across the globe by the mass media in a way that was previously unknown. Individual and collective experiences of injustice, of contempt, humiliation and lack of respect for one’s dignity, are heightened into normative claims aimed at different audiences with different reasons, if necessary also with violence. Thus we can at present only conjecture what conflicts over just normative orders will be triggered by the predicted change in the global climate, what distribution conflicts over increasingly scarce essential resources in the more seriously affected regions and what social and cultural struggles will be triggered once the predicted mass migrations to the more favourable climatic zones begin.

Those affected pay no attention to functional differentiations within global social systems or to semantic and institutional differences between law, morality and religion. While people are acting and speaking, they are certainly also anonymous points of intersection of systems of social communication and of unconscious symbolic systems – mere tokens in a strategic game over markets for raw materials and consumer goods or the mouthpieces of particular group interests who are instrumentalized by the mass media. Our aim is not to lull the humanities and the social sciences back into an anthropological slumber and to orient them to an image of human beings that denies their contextual character and tries to pass itself off as a transcendental a priori. However, we regard factual expressions of outrage over injustices – regardless of how justified, one-sided, selective or distorted they may be in particular cases – as sufficient to raise the question of how a theory of the formation of normative orders that goes beyond the dichotomy between action theory and structural or systems theory is possible today, a theory which, given the global challenges, avoids the quietism of structural theory as much as the alarmism of a theory of action.


Headlines

Newsletter aus dem Forschungszentrum „Normative Ordnungen“

Zukünftig informiert ein Newsletter über aktuelle Veranstaltungen, Veröffentlichungen und wissenswerte Entwicklungen im Forschungszentrum „Normative Ordnungen“. Die erste Ausgabe finden Sie hier...

Upcoming Events

8. Februar 2023, 18.00 Uhr

ENTFÄLLT!: Virtuelle Ringvorlesung "Algorithms // A Brave New World?": Carina Prunkl (University of Oxford, Institute for Ethics in AI): Can we, will we, and should we have AI judges? Mehr...

8. Februar 2022, 19.15 Uhr

Öffentlicher Vortrag: Fabio Wolkenstein (Universität Wien): Die dunkle Seite der Christdemokratie. Mehr...

9. Februar 2023, 20 Uhr

Lecture & Film „Kino am Abgrund der Moderne. Die Filme von Luis Buñuel“: Kristoffer Noheden (Stockholm): Dreams of Desire: Belle de jour, Eros and Surrealist Cinema. Mehr...

-----------------------------------------

Latest Media

Videoarchiv

Weitere Videoaufzeichnungen finden Sie hier...

Judging Facts, Judging Norms: Training Machine Learning Models to Judge Humans Requires a New Approach to Labeling Data

Gillian Hadfield (University of Toronto)
Ringvorlesung "Algorithms // A Brave New World?"

Verkehrt die Welt: Buñuels Le fantôme de la liberté

Prof. Dr. Vinzenz Hediger (Professor für Filmwissenschaft an der Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main und Co-Sprecher der Forschungsinitiative "ConTrust" am Forschungsverbund "Normative Ordnungen")
Lecture and Film: Kino am Abgrund der Moderne. Die Filme von Luis Buñuel

New full-text Publications

Hanna Pfeifer and Irene Weipert-Fenner (2022)

ConTrust Working Paper No. 3: "Time and the Growth of Trust under Conditions of Extreme Uncertainty. Illustrations from Peace and
Conflict Studies". More...

Rainer Forst (2022)

ConTrust Working Paper No. 2: "The Justification of Trust in Conflict. Conceptual and Normative Groundwork". More..