Structures of Legitimation of Private, Intermediate and Hybrid Regulatory Regimes

The question as to how non-state and quasi-state rule is to be legitimized became insistent already before the beginning of the 19th century, as modern statehood and civil society based on private law took shape as independent, autonomous spaces. The central concern of the project is the identification and accentuation of patterns of legitimation that arise with the emergence of such non-state or quasi-state activities, which themselves correspond de facto or de jure to the exercise of sovereign power. This can include the diverse forms of legislation, adjudication and the exercise of administrative competences as they were practiced in the 19th- and early 20th-century legal orders.

The project contributes to the research area “Plurality of Normative Orders.” The innovative regulation assemblages it examines make substantial contributions to understanding the social facticity of “normative plurality,” which relates to diverse and controversial narratives of legitimation. Such narratives of legitimation are identified by investigating legitimation requirements, legitimation criteria, such as legality, the common good, effectiveness and efficiency, and various sources and topoi of legitimation, such as autonomy, sovereignty, democracy or self-rule.

The project was able to build on the extensive prior findings of the project “Regulated Self-Regulation from a Legal Historical Perspective” from the first phase of the Cluster (2008-2011), which was primarily concerned with fields of practice and regulatory instruments of non-state and quasi-state regulation. As a result, work during the funding period beginning in 2015 was able to address the conceptual foundations and considerations arising from state theory and jurisprudence in relation to such modes of regulation and the references they make to legitimation.

Interdisciplinary cooperation with the political science oriented Cluster project on “The Legitimation of Non-State Regulation in Networked Normative Orders” (K.D. Wolf) was very fruitful and it benefitted from a workshop whose results have been published in the meantime.

While we were able to determine that the intensity of the (contemporary) scholarly debate on the legitimation of non-state regulation in Germany in the 19th and 20th centuries was, generally speaking, fairly thin, and thus did not play a significant role, there were indeed noteworthy exceptions. Terms such as “cooperative association” and “autonomy” in the work of the so-called Gierke School, as well as in Stein’s administrative theories (“Verwaltungslehre”) and the corporatist literature, are important points of reference. The latter’s strong orientation toward the democratic topoi of argumentation, even though it is actually classified as anti-democratic, is readily apparent. This seeming contradiction has to do with the fact that until the middle of the 20th century no uniform understanding or conception of democracy had emerged. Of more central importance were debates among practitioners and functionaries of the associations to which the project paid special attention. Topoi of legitimation with sector-specific contours developed within the context of these debates.

From an interdisciplinary and transnational perspective – which played an important role in the cooperation with the project “The Legitimation of Non-State Regulation in Networked Normative Orders” – the near-constant invocation of epistemic elements of justification is striking, as is the rich variety of input and output oriented approaches to justification.

The most important publications of this project:

*Collin, Peter: “The Legitimation of Self-Regulation and Co-Regulation in Corporatist Concepts of Legal Scholars in the Weimar Republic”, in: Politics and Governance 5(1), 2017, [online] [15.10.2017].

Wolf, Klaus Dieter/Peter Collin/Melanie Coni-Zimmer (eds.): ”Legitimization of Private and Public Regulation: Past and Present”, in: Politics and Governance 5(1), 2017, [online] [15.10.2017].

Collin, Peter: Privat-staatliche Regelungsstrukturen im frühen Industrie- und Sozialstaat, Oldenburg: De Gruyter, 2016.

Collin, Peter/Sabine Rudischhauser/Pascale Gonod (eds.): “Autorégulation régulée. Analyses historiques de structures de régulation hybrides / Regulierte Selbstregulierung. Historische Analysen hybrider Regelungsstrukturen“ (= Trivium. Revue franco-allemande de sciences humaines et sociales 21), 2016, [online] [15.10.2017].

Collin, Peter: “Regulierte Selbstregulierung der Wirtschaft“, in: Zeitschrift für Neuere Rechtsgeschichte 37, 2015, pp. 10–31.


People in this project:

  • Project director / contact
  • Project members

Publications of this project:

  • Duve, Thomas (2017): Spatial Perceptions, Juridical Practices, and Early International Legal Thought around 1500: From Tordesillas to Saragossa, in: Kadelbach, Stefan/Kleinlein, Thomas/Roth-Isigkeit, David (eds.), System, Order, and International Law. The Early History of International Legal Thought from Machiavelli to Hegel, Oxford, New York (NY): Oxford University Press, 2017, pp. 418-442.
  • Wolf, Klaus Dieter (2014): The Non-existence of Private Self-regulation in the Transnational Sphere and its Implications for the Responsibility to Procure Legitimacy. The Case of the lex sportiva, in: Global Constitutionalism 3: 3 (2014), 275-309.
  • Open-Access-Logo Wolf, Klaus Dieter Scholz, Saskia (2014): Ordnungswandel durch Umkehrung einer Normenhierarchie. Der Schutz geistigen Eigentums und das Recht auf Gesundheit, HSFK-Report Nr. 5/2014.
    Details | Link to full text


Neuer europäischer Forschungsverbund untersucht ab 2020 Wahlen in Zeiten der Krise demokratischer Ordnungen

Im Rahmen des neuen, von der Europäischen Kommission geförderten Forschungsverbunds „Reconstructing Democracy in Times of Crisis“ analysiert Rainer Forst, Co-Sprecher des Exzellenzclusters „Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen“, zukünftig die Legitimität von und die Legitimation durch Wahlen in Zeiten der Krise der Demokratie. Mehr...

Denken im Widerspruch

Prof. Dr. Rainer Forst, Co-Sprecher des Exzellenzclusters "Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen" zum Gedenken an Theodor W. Adorno aus Anlass seines 50. Todestags. Mehr...

„Noch einmal: Zum Verhältnis von Moralität und Sittlichkeit" - Vortrag von Jürgen Habermas am 19. Juni 2019. Skript und Aufzeichnung verfügbar

Die Meldung zum Vortrag finden Sie: Hier...
Weitere Informationen (Videoaufzeichnung, Skript und Medienecho) finden Sie: Hier...

"The History of Postmetaphysical Philosophy and the Future of Democracy" - Konferenz zu Ehren von Jürgen Habermas

Am 20. und 21. Juni fand am Exzellenzcluster "Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen" die Konferenz "The History of Postmetaphysical Philosophy and the Future of Democracy" statt.
Die Meldung zur Konferenz finden Sie hier...
Das Programm und weitere Informationen finden Sie hier...

Upcoming Events

9. Dezember 2019, 18 Uhr c.t.

Vortragsreihe „Haftungsrecht und Künstliche Intelligenz“: Prof. Dr. Gerhard Wagner, LL.M. University of Chicago (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin): Haftungsregime für autonome Systeme. Mehr...

12. bis 14. Dezember 2019

Erste DVPW Thementagung: Wie relevant ist die Politikwissenschaft? Wissenstransfer und gesellschaftliche Wirkung von Forschung und Lehre. Mehr...

12. Dezember 2019, 18 Uhr

Frankfurter Kolloquium für Internetforschung: Karolina Zawada: Die Inhaltspolizei auf YouTube. Mehr...


Latest Media

Kritik der Wertegemeinschaft oder: Über den Platz der Politik in der politischen Auseinandersetzung

Christoph Möllers
Kantorowicz Lecture in Political Language

Digitale Rechtspersönlichkeit? Zur Diskussion um die zivilrechtliche Rechtsfähigkeit autonomer Systeme

Prof. Dr. Thomas Riehm
Ringvorlesung "Haftungsrecht und Künstliche Intelligenz"

New full-text Publications

Burchard, Christoph (2019):

Künstliche Intelligenz als Ende des Strafrechts? Zur algorithmischen Transformation der Gesellschaft. Normative Orders Working Paper 02/2019. More...

Kettemann, Matthias (2019):

Die normative Ordnung der Cyber-Sicherheit: zum Potenzial von Cyber-Sicherheitsnormen. Normative Orders Working Paper 01/2019. More...