Power, Rule and Violence in Orders of Justification

As many discussions within and outside of our research cluster during the first funding phase revealed, an understanding of “normative order” as an order of “justifications” faces the objection that it represents a form of idealism: Does such a conception of order leave any room for concepts such as power, rule, domination, and violence, or are the latter seen merely as disturbances? The aim of this cooperative research project was to refute this objection and to show that the concept of a “justification order” is suitable for reconceptualizing the above-mentioned concepts of power, rule, and domination in fruitful ways. This also has consequences for our understanding of the law.

(1) Noumenal Power (Forst)

In this research project, the concept of power was theorized – somewhat paradoxically – as an intelligible or noumenal phenomenon. If we understand power as the capacity of agents to motivate others to think or to act in ways that they would not otherwise have thought or acted, then we must situate power in the “space of justification” if we want to distinguish the modalities of power from mere physical effects. For exercising power means that A “gives” B reasons, which means in turn that power actually operates at the level of reasons. This does not predetermine how power is exercised – whether, for example, through a convincing argument, an act of seduction, a lie, or a threat – or whether the reasons in question are good or bad ones; it implies only that “having power” means (in ascending order) using, influencing, occupying or even “sealing off” the space of justifications that is determinative for others – for example, through dominant or hegemonic justifying narratives. To hint at a taxonomy of forms of power, “rule” exists when a specific order of justification has taken shape in which the social and political relations of classification and subordination are stabilized in ways that are based on acceptance. Domination appears where such relations cannot be justified because of their asymmetrical character and are legitimized by restricting the space of reasons in a one-sided way. Oppression, (illegitimate) coercion and violence arise where those who are subjugated count less and less and are increasingly unable to act as subjects of justification – the limiting case being where the space of justification is replaced by mere physical facticity, that is, pure violence. Power takes shape and is reproduced, therefore, exclusively in the space of justifications, and power struggles are conducted in this space. When the justifications of a system of rule are questioned, it may be able to endure through lies, threats, or recourse to means of violence; but its power diminishes to the extent that it is increasingly reliant on such measures without an accompanying narrative.

In the context of the cooperation with Klaus Günther and our collaborators Malte Ibsen and Johann Szews we received a number of visits from international guest researchers for talks and on fellowships and to conduct joint workshops – among them such world-renowned theorists of power as Amy Allen, Seyla Benhabib, Allen Buchanan, Nancy Fraser, Helen Frowe, Sally Haslanger, Bob Goodin, Carol Gould, Duncan Ivison, Tony Laden, John McCormick, David Owen, Michael Rosen, Philip Pettit, Anne Phillips, Bill Scheuerman, James Tully, and Melissa Williams. Our work was also presented at a large number of national and international venues.

The theoretical approach to “noumenal power” (in particular the paper in the Journal of Political Power [see below] and accompanying essays in Normativity and Power) prompted numerous discussions. In an earlier book co-authored by Rainer Forst with critics entitled Justice, Democracy and the Right to Justification (London: Bloomsbury, 2014), Amy Allen, Kevin Olson, and Tony Laden took issue with this approach. A further dialogue followed with Amy Allen and Mark Haugaard, which has also been published (see below). A set of critical essays by Albena Azmanova, Pablo Gilabert, Mark Haugaard, Clarissa Hayward, Matthias Kettner, Steven Lukes, Max Pensky, and Simon Susen is due to appear in the Journal of Political Power. Three further collections of papers on Forst’s work are underway which will contain critical contributions on the concept of noumenal power: Amy Allen, Sarah Clark Miller, John McCormick, and Melissa Yates will devote their papers to this theme (in preparation for Penn State Press); in another volume (in preparation for Manchester UP) Patchen Markell, David Owen, Melissa Williams, and Daniel Weinstock will contribute papers on power; and in a volume in preparation for Oxford UP, Mattias Kumm, Arthur Ripstein, Enzo Rossi, Andrea Sangiovanni, and Bernhard Schlink will discuss the relation between justification and power. Rainer Forst will write replies to all these essays. A large number of other articles, such as Lois McNay’s in the most recent edition of the European Journal of Political Theory in which she criticizes the theory of noumenal power, have already been published or are currently in preparation.

Rainer Forst’s research associate from 2013 to 2016 was Malte Ibsen (MPhil University of Oxford). During his time at the Cluster he wrote a dissertation on “The Idea of a Critical Theory of Global Justice” under the joint supervision of Rainer Forst and Axel Honneth. The dissertation aims to unearth the theoretical resources within the Frankfurt School tradition for developing a critical theory of global justice, ranging from Max Horkheimer’s early attempt to elaborate a materialist theory of society to Rainer Forst’s more recent theory of transnational justice. The dissertation argues that the tradition of Critical Theory provides us with both a characteristic conception of what constitutes a theory of justice and a conception of what justice is. The above mentioned conceptions of rule and domination within an order of justification play a major role in Ibsen’s approach.

(2) Justification as Law-Making [Recht-Fertigung] (Günther)

In modern legal systems, “positive” law is often referred to as “congealed politics.” But when analyzing and describing this phenomenon, it may be necessary to start earlier: law arises out of “congealed reasons.” What has proved itself in the space of reasons is stabilized with the help of the law and is equipped with the authorization to use force by additional justifications. But law is also a means for authorizing someone to impose his or her reasons against possible conflicting reasons. In this way, power becomes legal rule. This conjecture was deepened in several essays, in particular with reference to Joseph Raz’s characterization of authoritative reasons as exclusionary reasons. If a legal order can be traced back reconstructively to a decision by free and equal individuals to regulate their social life with the means of modern law (in Habermas’s terms: to form an association of legal subjects), then in doing so the latter also give rise to the type of exclusionary reasons. However – contra Raz – these reasons must be capable of being criticized (and altered) in turn in legally regulated procedures if the legal community of free and equal subjects is to be able to reproduce itself in its only adequate form, namely, as a democratic constitutional state.

The distinguishing feature of this research is its emphasis on the discursive and communicative dimension of power. Here it can be shown that the concept of exclusionary reasons is modeled, so to speak, on the prototype of noumenal power as this has been described by Rainer Forst. Exclusionary reasons function as reasons that are able to prevail against the reasons subjectively recognized by the actors involved. This, according to Raz, is because they are traced back to a legitimate authority that takes the place of the subjectively acknowledged reasons. In contrast to noumenal power, the authoritative power of the legal reasons is generated constructively by the legitimate authority. Nevertheless, it relies on the same mechanism of noumenal power. In further essays on justification narratives and on developments in criminal law it was shown that public criticism of the legitimate authority of exclusionary reasons can be bypassed or neutralized by embedding legal reasons in justification narratives. With such narratives, legal reasons can be relativized, bypassed, or even transgressed without having to expose the reasons to public criticism in legally regulated procedures.

The doctoral project (still in progress) of project collaborator Johann Szews entitled “Zahlungsmoral. Untersuchungen zum Zusammenhang von moralischer und ökonomischer Verschuldung” (Payment Morality: Explorations of the Relationship between Moral and Economic Debt) deals with a current aspect of the relationship between law and power: the debtor relationship. This project addresses basic social-philosophical and normative questions to the contemporary social order of indebtedness: What forms of subjectivity are implied by debt? To what extent can we speak of a “social pathology” of indebtedness? The study focuses on a core problem: How should the connection between moral and economic debt be understood? This research question is motivated by the intuition that neither functionalist, economic-theoretical problem diagnoses that emphasize the increasing economic instability resulting from high levels of indebtedness, nor critical approaches based on theories of justice that accord central importance to question of distribution, are sufficient for an adequate understanding of the form of the indebted life. The doctoral project argues that the conceptual framework of an ethical critique of capitalism is required to work out its immanent critique-worthiness beyond economic dysfunctionality and distributive injustice. The purpose of these reflections is to show that the form of the indebted life not only gives rise to unjust effects (for example, poverty), but also produces relations to self and to the world which are inherently worthy of ethical criticism. Building on a critical interpretation of Friedrich Nietzsche and Max Weber, the dissertation argues that forms of indebtedness are marked by a specific form of temporality. The central thesis is that the social promise of future freedom as a result of voluntarily assuming debt by taking on loans turns into a continuous subjective consciousness of guilt under conditions of over-indebtedness and the dependencies associated with indebtedness. The relationship between freedom and dependency in subjectifying relations of debt/guilt (Schuldverhältnissen) is analyzed by drawing on Michel Foucault's conception of relational power (thus going beyond Nietzsches und Webers conceptions of power). The form of the indebted life is criticized from the perspective of an ethical critique of capitalism and alternative forms of subjectivization are explored.

The theses of this sub-project have regularly been discussed in the “Colloquium on Legal Theory“ of the cluster, in which professors, post-docs and PhD-students are participating and to which occasionally external guests are invited (e.g. Fred Schauer, Robert Alexy, Richard W. Wright, Larissa Katz, Matthias Mahlmann). An important impulse for Guenther’s paper on “Parapractical Narratives of Justification” (Parapraktische Rechtfertigungsnarrative) was the workshop “Narratives of Justification – Terror and Violence in Cinema” (March 2014). Two international workshops were organized in cooperation with the “Research Center on the Theory and Ethics of Criminal Law“ (Prof. Andreas von Hirsch) on the topics of “Retribution and Censure“, (December 2014) and “Philosophical Foundations of International Criminal Law“ (April 2017). Guenther’s theses were presented and discussed also at an international conference on “Transitional Justice“ (August 2016) in Bogotá (Columbia), which was organized in cooperation with the faculty of law of Rosario University.

The most important publications of this project:

Forst, Rainer: Normativität und Macht. Zur Analyse sozialer Rechtfertigungsordnungen, Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2015. English Translation (by Ciaran Cronin): Normativity and Power, Oxford: University Press, 2017.

Forst, Rainer: “Noumenal Power”, in: The Journal of Political Philosophy, 23(2), 2015, pp. 111–127.

Forst, Rainer: “Transnational Justice and Non-Domination. A Discourse-Theoretical Approach”, in: Barbara Buckinx, Jonathan Trejo-Mathys, Timothy Waligore (eds): Domination Across Borders, London/New York: Routledge, 2015, pp. 88–110.

Ibsen, Malte: “Global Justice and Two Conceptions of Practice-Dependence”, in: Raisons Politiques, (special issue on the theme “Practice-Dependence and Global Justice”) 51(3), 2013, pp. 81–96.

Günther, Klaus: “Parapraktische Rechtfertigungsnarrative“, in: Jochen Schuff and Martin Seel (eds.): Erzählungen und Gegenerzählungen. Terror und Krieg im Kino des 21. Jahrhunderts, Frankfurt am Main/New York: Campus, 2016, pp. 101–124.

Günther, Klaus: “Zur Rekonstruktion des Rechts: Das System der Rechte“, in: Peter Koller and Christian Hiebaum (eds.): Jürgen Habermas: Faktizität und Geltung, Klassiker Auslegen, Vol. 62 (ed. by Otfried Höffe), Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter, 2016, pp. 51–68.

Günther, Klaus: “De nihilo aliquid facit – Zur Kriminologie des effizienten Regelbruchs“, in: Henning Schmidt-Semisch and Henner Hess (eds.): Die Sinnprovinz der Kriminalität. Zur Dynamik eines sozialen Feldes, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 2014, pp. 121–136.

Szews, Johann: Zahlungsmoral. Überlegungen zum Zusammenhang von Schuld und Schulden mit Nietzsche, Weber und Bourdieu, Normative Orders Working Paper 2/2017 (25 pages).

 

 

People in this project:

  • Project director / contact
    • Forst, Rainer, Prof. Dr. | Profile
    • Günther, Klaus, Prof. Dr. | Profile
  • Project members
    • Ibsen, Malte, M.Phil. in Politics: Political Theory (Oxon) | Profile
    • Szews, Johann (former member) | Profile


Publications of this project:

  • Forst, Rainer (2018): “Human Rights in Context: A Comment on Sangiovanni”, in: Adam Etinson (Hg.), Human Rights: Moral or Political?, Oxford: Oxford University Press, S. 200–208.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2018): 101. “Notwendige Güter für ein gutes Leben? Einige Überlegungen zum Begriff der Gerechtigkeit”, in: Karl Ulrich Mayer (Hg.), Gutes Leben oder gute Gesellschaft?, Nova Acta Leopoldina, NF 417, Stuttgart: Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft, S. 193-202
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2018): “Das Recht der Negativität”, in: T. Khurana, D. Quadflieg, F. Raimondi, J. Rebentisch, D. Setton (Hg.), Negativität. Kunst, Recht, Politik, Berlin: Suhrkamp, S. 196–206.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2018): “Committed Critical Theory. Some Thoughts on Stephen White’s A Democratic Bearing”, in: Philosophy and Social Criticism 44(2), S. 126–130.
    Details | doi:10.1177/0191453717752776
  • Forst, Rainer (2018): “Noumenal Power Revisited: Reply to Critics”, in: Journal of Political Power 11(3), S. 294–321
    Details | DOI:10.1080/2158379X.2018.1523314
  • Forst, Rainer (2017): “What’s Critical About a Critical Theory of Justice?”, in: Banu Bargu u. Chiara Bottici (eds.), Feminism, Capitalism, and Critique. Essays in Honor of Nancy Fraser. Basingstoke: Palgrave, S. 225-242.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2017): “Noumenal Alienation: Rousseau, Kant and Marx on the Dialectics of Self-Determination”, in: Kantian Review 22(4), S. 523-551.
    Details | 10.1017/S1369415417000267
  • Open-Access-Logo Forst, Rainer (2017): "The Justification of Basic Rights: A Discourse-Theoretical Approach", Normative Orders Working Paper Series of the Cluster of Excellence ‘The Formation of Normative Orders’ 02/2017.
    Details | Link to full text | urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-440266
  • Forst, Rainer (2017): "A Critical Theory of Human Rights. Some Groundwork", in: Penelope Deutscher & Cristina Lafont (Hg.), Critical Theory in Critical Times. Transforming the Global Political and Economic Order, New York: Columbia University Press, S. 74-88
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2017): "Toleration and its Paradoxes: A Tribute to John Horton", in: Philosophia 2017, online first
    Details | Link to full text | doi:10.1007/s11406-016-9801-0
  • Forst, Rainer (2017): “Religion, Reason, and Toleration: Bayle, Kant – and Us”, in: Cécile Laborde u. Aurélia Bardon (Hg.), Religion in Liberal Political Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, S. 249-261
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2017): Normativity and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2017): „Political Liberalism: A Kantian View", Ethics 128 (1), S. 123-144.
    Details | 10.1017/S1369415417000267
  • Forst, Rainer (2016): Christoph Möllers: Die Möglichkeit der Normen, in: Die Zeit 3, 14.1.2016, S. 43
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2016): „Toleranz kommt vor Glückseligkeit", Interview durch Bernd Frye, in: Forschung Frankfurt, 1/2016; S. 6-9.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2016): "The Justification of Basic Rights: A Discourse-Theoretical Approach", in: Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 45 (3), S. 7-28
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2016): "Toleranz. Die Herausforderung neuer Grenzziehungen für westliche Demokratien", in: Shalini Randeria (Hg.), Border Crossings: Grenzverschiebungen und Grenzüberschreitungen in einer globalisierten Welt, Zürich:vdf, S. 223-235
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2016): "The Point and Ground of Human Rights: A Kantian Constructivist View", in: David Held u. Pietro Maffettone (Hg.), Global Political Theory, Cambridge: Polity, S. 22-39
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2016): "Eine fortschrittliche Kritik des Fortschritts? Kommentar zu Amy Allen, 'Das Ende - und der Zweck - des Fortschritts'", in: Michael Quante (Hg.), Geschichte - Gesellschaft - Geltung. XXIII: Deutscher Kongress für Philosophie, Hamburg: Meiner, S. 427 - 432
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2016): "What does it Mean to Justify Basic Rights? Reply to Düwell, Newey, Rummens and Valentini", in: Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 45 (3), S. 76-90
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2016): „Gibt es religiöse Eigenheiten, die ein demokratischer Rechtsstaat nicht tolerieren sollte?“, Stellungnahme in: Philosophie Magazin 2/2016, S. 63.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2016): „Toleranz. Zwischen sozialer Beherrschung und demokratischer Vernunft“, in: der blaue reiter. Journal für Philosophie, 39, S. 52-55.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer; Buddeberg, Eva (2016): Pierre Bayle, Toleranz. Ein philosophischer Kommentar, übers. v. E. Buddeberg, Einl. v. E. Buddeberg u. R. Forst, Berlin. Suhrkamp
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer; Buddeberg, Eva (2016): "Zur Einleitung: Pierre Bayles Theorie der Toleranz", in: Pierre Bayle, Toleranz. Ein philosophischer Kommentar, hg. v. E. Buddeberg u. R. Forst, übers. v. E. Buddeberg, Berlin: Suhrkamp, S. 11-45
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer; Ulrich, Bernd (2016): „Kann die Linke noch kämpfen? Barbarei oder Solidarität: Die globale Armut ist vor unserer Haustür angekommen“ (zus. mit Bernd Ulrich), in: Die Zeit Nr. 20, 4. Mai 2016, S. 4-5.
    Details | Link to full text
  • Forst, Rainer (2015): Between Social Domination and Democratic Reason: The Concept of Toleration, in: Contemporary Political Theory, Vol. 14, Nr. 2, S. 190-196.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2015): "Tolerieren können wir nur, was wir falsch finden", Interview mit Nils Markwardt, Philosophie Magazin, 02/2015, S. 70-75.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2015): "Öffentlichkeit und Macht. Im Gedenken an Bernhard Peters", TranState Working Papers, Nr. 186, Universität Bremen
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2015): "Toleranz und Fortschritt", Sitzungsberichte der Wissenschaftlichen Gesellschaft an der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Bd. LII, Nr. 2, Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart, S. 1-10.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2015): "The Right to Justification: Moral and Political, Transcendental and Historical. Reply to Seyla Benhabib, Jeff Flynn and Matthias Fritsch", in: Political Theory 43 (6), S. 822-837
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2015): A Critical Theory of Politics: Grounds, Method and Aims. Reply to Simone Chambers, Stephen White and Lea Ypi, in: Philosophy and Social Criticism 41:3, S. 225-234.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2015): Justice, Democracy and the Right to Justification: Reflections on Jürgen Neyer's Normative Theory of the European Union, in: Dimitry Kochenov, Gráinne de Burca, Andrew Williams (Hg.), Europe's Justice Deficit, Oxford: Hart, S. 227-234.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2015): Human Rights, in: Darrel Moellendorf u. Heather Widdows (Hg.), The Routledge Handbook of Global Ethics, London u. New York: S. 72-81.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2015): Noumenal Power, in: The Journal of Political Philosophy, Vol. 23, Nr. 2, S. 111-127.
    Details | Link to full text
  • Forst, Rainer (2015): Normativität und Macht. Zur Analyse sozialer Rechtfertigungsordnungen, Berlin: Suhrkamp.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2015): Justificación y crítica, Spanische Übersetzung (von Graciela Calderón), Buenos Aires: Katz Editores.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2015): Religion und Toleranz von der Aufklärung bis zum postsäkulären Zeitalter: Bayle, Kant und Habermas, in: Matthias Lutz-Bachmann (Hg.), Postsäkularismus, Frankfurt/M.: Campus, S. 97-134.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2015): Transnational Justice and Non-Domination. A Discourse-Theoretical Approach, in: Barbara Bucknix, Jonathan Trejo-Mathys, Timothy Waligore (Hg.): Domination Across Borders, New York: Routledge, S. 88-100.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2015): „Toleranz ist keine Schönwetterveranstaltung“, Interview mit Beate Hausbichler, Der Standard (Wien), 30.9.2015, S. 10.
    Details | Link to full text
  • Forst, Rainer (2015): „Rechtfertigung in der praktischen Philosophie“, Stellungnahmen (zus. mit B. Gesang, P. Stemmer, H. Wittwer), in: Information Philosophie 4, Dezember 2015, S. 20-27.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2015): Toleration, in: The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy, 3. Aufl., Cambridge University Press 2015.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2015): „Fortschritt. Nehmen Freiheit und Toleranz ständig zu?“, in: Jürgen Kaube und Jörn Laakmann (Hg.), Lexikon der offenen Fragen, Stuttgart: Metzler, S. 81f.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer; Möllers, C.; Zürn, Michael (2015): "Brauchen wir eine Weltregierung?", in: Silke Lechner u. Ellen Ueberschär (Hg.), Damit wir klug werden. Die wichtigsten Texte des Stuttgarter Kirchentages, Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus, S. 32-49
    Details
  • Szews, Johann (2015): Die Empfindlichkeitsregler des Rechts. Zur Möglichkeit ästhetischer Kritik. In: Forum Recht 3/15. S. 89-91.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2014): Justice, Democracy and the Right to Justification. Rainer Forst in Dialogue, Bloomsbury Academic.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2014): Toleration and Democracy (Übers. v. C. Cronin), Journal of Social Philosophiy 45:1, S. 66-75.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2014): Die Unwahrscheinlichen, in: Kursbuch 178 (Thema "1964"), S. 142-145.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2014): Toleranz, in: Thomas M. Schmidt u. Annette Pitschmann (Hg.): Handbuch Religion und Säkularisierung, Stuttgart: Metzler, S. 272-277.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2014): Justice and Democracy in Transnational Contexts: A Critical Realistic View. In: social research Vol 81 : No 3 : Fall 2014, 667-682
    Details | Link to full text
  • Forst, Rainer (2014): Legitimität, Demokratie und Gerechtigkeit. Zur Reflexivität normativer Ordnungen, in: Oliver Flügel-Martinsen, Daniel Gaus, Tanja Hitzel-Cassagnes, Franziska Martinsen (Hg.): Deliberative Kritik - Kritik der Deliberation. Festschrift für Rainer Schmalz-Bruns, Wiesbaden: Springer, S.137-147.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer; Allen, Amy; Haugaard, Mark (2014): "Power and Reason, Justice and Domination. A Conversation", Journal of Political Power 7, S. 7-33.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer; Brown, Wendy (2014): The Power of Tolerance, New York: Columbia University Press.
    Details
  • Günther, Klaus (2014): Criminal law, Crime and Punishment as Communication, Normative Orders Working Paper 02/2014.
    Details | Link to full text | urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-346639
  • Forst, Rainer (2013): Zum Begriff eines Rechtfertigungsnarrativs, in: Fahrmeir, Andreas (Hg.), Rechtfertigungsnarrative. Zur Begründung normativer Ordnung durch Erzählungen, Normative Orders Bd. 7, Frankfurt am Main: Campus 2013, S. 11-28.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2013): Critica dei rapporti di giustificazione, Italienische Übersetzung (von Enrico Zoffoli) Turin: Trauben.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2013): The normative order of justice and peace, in: Hellmann, Gunther (ed.): Justice and Peace. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on a Contested Relationship, Normative Orders vol. 10, Frankfurt am Main: Campus 2013, p. 69-89.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2013): Dos imágenes de la justicia, in: Gustavo Pereira (Hg.): Perspectivas críticas de justicia social, Porto Alegre: Evangraf, S. 29-46.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2013): Noumenal Power, Normative Orders Working Paper 02/2013.
    Details | Link to full text | urn:nbn:de:hebis:30:3-332177
  • Forst, Rainer (2013): Ein großer Liberaler. Zum Tod des amerikanischen Rechtsphilosophen Ronald Dworkin, in: Die Zeit 9, 21.02.2013, S. 58.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2013): Toleration in Conflict, Englische Übersetzung (von Ciaran Cronin), New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2013): Gerechtigkeit ist ein ständiger Prozess (Interview mit T. Vasek u. T. Hürter), in: Hohe Luft. Philosophie-Zeitschrift 4, S.60-67.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2013): A Kantian Republican Conception of Justice as Non-Domination, in: Andreas Niederberger u. Philipp Schink (Hg.): Republican Democracy, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, S. 281-292.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2013): Gerechtigkeit nach Marx, in: Rahel Jaeggi und Daniel Loick (Hg.): Nach Marx, Berlin: Suhrkamp, S. 101-121.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2013): On the Role of the Political Theorist Regarding Global Injustice, Interview mit Katrin Flickschuh und Darrel Moellendorf durch Valentin Beck und Julian Culp, in: Global Justice. Theory, Practice, Rhetoric 6, S. 40-53.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2013): Gerechtigkeit und Demokratie in transnationalen Kontexten. Eine realistische Betrachtung, in: Hubertus Buchstein (Hg.): Die Versprechen der Demokratie, Baden-Baden: Nomos, S.125-139.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2013): Toleranz ist nicht beliebig, in: Die Zeit 25, Sonderheft Philosophie, S. 34f.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2013): Justification and Critique. Towards a Critical Theory of Politics, Englische Übersetzung (von Ciaran Cronin), Cambridge: Polity Press.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2013): Two Pictures of Justice, in: Forst: Justification and Critique, S. 17-37.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2013): Man kann überall Frankfurter sein. Ein Gespräch über Geist und Mobilität, Interview mit Darrel Moellendorf durch Bernd Frye und Ulrike Jaspers, in: Forschung Frankfurt 2/2013, S. 57-61.
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2013): “Radikale Gerechtigkeit. Zu Iris Marion Youngs Kritik des distributiven Paradigmas”, Deutsche Version (übers. Usama Ibrahim), in Peter Niesen u. Tim Eckes (Hg.), Zwischen Demokratie und globaler Verantwortung. Iris Marion Youngs Theorie politischer Normativität, Baden-Baden: Nomos, S. 51-58.
    Details
  • Ibsen, Malte (2013): "Global Justice and Two Conceptions of Practice-Dependence", Raisons Politiques (51/3), August 2013, 81-96
    Details
  • Forst, Rainer (2012): The Right to Justification. Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice, Englische Übersetzung (von Jeff Flynn), New York: Columbia University Press, 2012.
    Details


Headlines

Neuer europäischer Forschungsverbund untersucht ab 2020 Wahlen in Zeiten der Krise demokratischer Ordnungen

Im Rahmen des neuen, von der Europäischen Kommission geförderten Forschungsverbunds „Reconstructing Democracy in Times of Crisis“ analysiert Rainer Forst, Co-Sprecher des Exzellenzclusters „Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen“, zukünftig die Legitimität von und die Legitimation durch Wahlen in Zeiten der Krise der Demokratie. Mehr...

Denken im Widerspruch

Prof. Dr. Rainer Forst, Co-Sprecher des Exzellenzclusters "Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen" zum Gedenken an Theodor W. Adorno aus Anlass seines 50. Todestags. Mehr...

„Noch einmal: Zum Verhältnis von Moralität und Sittlichkeit" - Vortrag von Jürgen Habermas am 19. Juni 2019. Skript und Aufzeichnung verfügbar

Die Meldung zum Vortrag finden Sie: Hier...
Weitere Informationen (Videoaufzeichnung, Skript und Medienecho) finden Sie: Hier...

"The History of Postmetaphysical Philosophy and the Future of Democracy" - Konferenz zu Ehren von Jürgen Habermas

Am 20. und 21. Juni fand am Exzellenzcluster "Die Herausbildung normativer Ordnungen" die Konferenz "The History of Postmetaphysical Philosophy and the Future of Democracy" statt.
Die Meldung zur Konferenz finden Sie hier...
Das Programm und weitere Informationen finden Sie hier...

Upcoming Events

6. Dezember 2019, 15 Uhr

Konferenz: A Light in Dark Times. Celebrating the Centennial of The New School for Social Research. Mehr...

9. Dezember 2019, 18 Uhr c.t.

Vortragsreihe „Haftungsrecht und Künstliche Intelligenz“: Prof. Dr. Gerhard Wagner, LL.M. University of Chicago (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin): Haftungsregime für autonome Systeme. Mehr...

12. bis 14. Dezember 2019

Erste DVPW Thementagung: Wie relevant ist die Politikwissenschaft? Wissenstransfer und gesellschaftliche Wirkung von Forschung und Lehre. Mehr...

-----------------------------------------

Latest Media

Kritik der Wertegemeinschaft oder: Über den Platz der Politik in der politischen Auseinandersetzung

Christoph Möllers
Kantorowicz Lecture in Political Language


Digitale Rechtspersönlichkeit? Zur Diskussion um die zivilrechtliche Rechtsfähigkeit autonomer Systeme

Prof. Dr. Thomas Riehm
Ringvorlesung "Haftungsrecht und Künstliche Intelligenz"


New full-text Publications

Burchard, Christoph (2019):

Künstliche Intelligenz als Ende des Strafrechts? Zur algorithmischen Transformation der Gesellschaft. Normative Orders Working Paper 02/2019. More...

Kettemann, Matthias (2019):

Die normative Ordnung der Cyber-Sicherheit: zum Potenzial von Cyber-Sicherheitsnormen. Normative Orders Working Paper 01/2019. More...