Publication details

Deliberating CFSP? European Foreign Policy and the International Criminal Court, RECON Working paper, ARENA Oslo.

Working paper

Author(s): Deitelhoff, Nicole
Year of publication: 2008

Abstract: The International Criminal Court (ICC), which commenced work in The Hague in 2002, is viewed by many as a success story for international governance and the beginning of a new era in international law. It is the first permanent institution able to prosecute severe violations of international humanitarian law in principle in independence of the nation states, and the speed with which the Rome Statute was developed, resolved and came into force was also impressive. Less than ten years passed between the inception of pre-negotiations and the ICC starting work. Some commentators suggest the proactive stance of the European Union, which supported the ICC from the word go, was a reason for this incredible speed. This paper therefore traces EU policy both within negotiations on acceptance of the Statute of Rome and following the latter’s successful adoption, through to the commencement of ICC operations, in order to examine whether the assumption that the EU has pursued a proactive stance is tenable. In this context, we have seen a clear shift in the EU’s stance. While during negotiations it hardly wielded a coherent policy, things changed fundamentally once the Statute was resolved. The fact that this proactive stance endured despite the struggle with the United States over the ICC must be seen in light of the fact that the CFSP is more than just an institutional forum to coordinate EU member states’ interests. The norms and principles that inform CFSP’s goals and strategies, such as democracy, rule of law, fundamental rights, and the CFSP’s procedural norms (e.g., regular consultation) are particularly suited to encourage deliberation among member states strengthening a consensus over time, even if the short-term interests of individual members would seem to suggest that they will leave the consensus position.

Keywords: CFSP/ESDP, democracy, fundamental/human rights, governance, international relations, rule of law

Subject(s): political science

Full text: http://www.reconproject.eu/projectweb/portalproject/AbstractRECONwp0810.html

Back to publications list


Headlines

Die Gegenwart der Religion und die Zukunft der Philosophie. Internationale Tagung über und mit Jürgen Habermas

Am 20. und 21. November 2020 fand die Tagung „Gegenwart der Religion - Zukunft der Philosophie. Überlegungen im Anschluss an das jüngste Werk von Jürgen Habermas“ statt. In acht Vorträgen international renommierter Wissenschaftler*innen aus der Philosophie und Theologie wurde an zwei Tagen das 2019 erschienene Werk "Auch eine Geschichte der Philosophie" mit dem Autor Jürgen Habermas diskutiert. Mehr...

DenkArt "Solidarität_Aber wie?"


Ab dem 9. März 2021 befasst sich die partizipative Vortragsreihe DenkArt "Solidarität_Aber wie?" mit der Frage, wie Solidarität heute überhaupt noch möglich ist. An insgesamt drei Terminen soll diskutiert werden, was die Gesellschaft gegenwärtig verbindet, wenn Werte strittig werden und soziale Unterschiede sie immer mehr spalten. Mehr...

Upcoming Events

4. März 2021, 16 Uhr

XX. Walter Hallstein-Kolloquium: Kooperativer Grundrechtsschutz in der Europäischen Union. Aktuelle Entwicklungen im Lichte der neuen Rechtsprechung des Bundesverfassungsgerichts und des EuGH. Mehr...

9. März 2021, 19.30 Uhr

DenkArt "Solidarität_Aber wie?": Kübra Gümüşay (Autorin und Bloggerin): Solidarität_Wie ist Teilhabe für alle möglich? Mehr...

-----------------------------------------

Latest Media

Videoarchiv

Weitere Videoaufzeichnungen finden Sie hier...

Pandemic Media. Preliminary Notes Toward an Inventory

Laliv Melamed, PhD, Philipp Dominik Keidl, PhD, Prof. Antonio Somaini and Prof. Vinzenz Hediger
Welcome Address by Prof. Rainer Forst
Book lɔ:ntʃ

Machtverschiebung durch Algorithmen – ein Thema für Datenschutz und Antidiskriminierungsrecht?

Prof. Antje von Ungern-Sternberg (Universität Trier)
Ringvorlesung "Machtverschiebung durch Algorithmen und KI"


New full-text Publications

Darrel Moellendorf (2020):

Hope and reasons. Normative Orders Working Paper 02/2020. More...

Annette Imhausen (2021):

Sciences and normative orders: perspectives from the earliest sciences. Normative Orders Working Paper 01/2021. More...