Publication details

Deliberating CFSP? European Foreign Policy and the International Criminal Court, RECON Working paper, ARENA Oslo.

Working paper

Author(s): Deitelhoff, Nicole
Year of publication: 2008

Abstract: The International Criminal Court (ICC), which commenced work in The Hague in 2002, is viewed by many as a success story for international governance and the beginning of a new era in international law. It is the first permanent institution able to prosecute severe violations of international humanitarian law in principle in independence of the nation states, and the speed with which the Rome Statute was developed, resolved and came into force was also impressive. Less than ten years passed between the inception of pre-negotiations and the ICC starting work. Some commentators suggest the proactive stance of the European Union, which supported the ICC from the word go, was a reason for this incredible speed. This paper therefore traces EU policy both within negotiations on acceptance of the Statute of Rome and following the latter’s successful adoption, through to the commencement of ICC operations, in order to examine whether the assumption that the EU has pursued a proactive stance is tenable. In this context, we have seen a clear shift in the EU’s stance. While during negotiations it hardly wielded a coherent policy, things changed fundamentally once the Statute was resolved. The fact that this proactive stance endured despite the struggle with the United States over the ICC must be seen in light of the fact that the CFSP is more than just an institutional forum to coordinate EU member states’ interests. The norms and principles that inform CFSP’s goals and strategies, such as democracy, rule of law, fundamental rights, and the CFSP’s procedural norms (e.g., regular consultation) are particularly suited to encourage deliberation among member states strengthening a consensus over time, even if the short-term interests of individual members would seem to suggest that they will leave the consensus position.

Keywords: CFSP/ESDP, democracy, fundamental/human rights, governance, international relations, rule of law

Subject(s): political science

Full text:

Back to publications list


„Noch einmal: Zum Verhältnis von Moralität und Sittlichkeit" - Vortrag von Jürgen Habermas am 19. Juni 2019

Zum Presseservice: Hier...

Weitere Informationen zum Vortrag „Noch einmal: Zum Verhältnis von Moralität und Sittlichkeit" von Jürgen Habermas am 19. Juni 2019 an der Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main finden Sie hier...

Konferenz "Säkularer Islam und Islamismuskritik"

Weitere Informationen zur Konferenz "Säkularer Islam und Islamismuskritik" unter Leitung von Prof. Dr. Susanne Schröter am 14. Juni 2019. Hier...

Upcoming Events

19. Juni 2019, 18 Uhr

Vortrag: Jürgen Habermas: Noch einmal: Moralität und SittlichkeitMehr...

20. bis 22. Juni 2019

International Conference: Configuring the Demos: Cinema, the Global Digital Economy, and the Crisis of Democracy. Mehr...


Latest Media

Distanz rahmen: News from Home

Alisa Lebow
Lecture and Film "Die Erfinderin der Formen. Das Kino von Chantal Akerman"

Das Humboldt Forum und die Ethnologie

Prof. Dr. Karl-Heinz Kohl, Johann Michael Möller, Prof. Gereon Sievernich, Dr. Gisela Völger. Moderation: Dr. Eva Charlotte Raabe

New full-text Publications

Kettemann, Matthias; Kleinwächter, Wolfgang; Senges, Max (2018):

The Time is Right for Europe to Take the Lead in Global Internet Governance. Normative Orders Working Paper 02/2018. More...

Kettemann, Matthias (2019):

Die normative Ordnung der Cyber-Sicherheit: zum Potenzial von Cyber-Sicherheitsnormen. Normative Orders Working Paper 01/2019. More...