Publication details

“Distributive justice, feasibility gridlocks, and the harmfulness of economic ideology”, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18(5), 2015, pp. 957-969.

Article

Author(s): Herzog, Lisa
Year of publication: 2015

Abstract: Many political theorists think about how to make societies more just. In recent years, with interests shifting from principles to their institutional realization, there has been much debate about feasibility and the role it should play in theorizing. What has been underexplored, however, is how feasibility depends on the attitudes and perceptions of individuals, not only with regard to their own behaviour, but also with regard to the behaviour of others. This can create coordination problems, which can be described as “feasibility gridlocks”. These problems are interesting from a normative perspective, not only because they arguably play an important role for the feasibility of institutions, but also because they contain a normative element themselves: individual might be willing to cooperate in order change the “feasibility frontier” (Wiens D (forthcoming) Political ideals and the feasibility frontier. Econ Philos), but only if others are also willing to do their bit, which contains a judgment about the fair distribution of burdens. Beliefs about the selfish nature of human beings, however, can make feasibility gridlocks more likely. This is why what I call, for the sake of brevity, “economic ideology”, i.e. an account of human nature as fundamentally self-interested, can be harmful. Finding a way out of such equilibriums therefore is an important task for political theorists and social reformers.

Keywords: feasibility, economic ideology, motivation

Research area: Research Area 1: The Normativity of Normative Orders: Origins, Vanishing Points, Performativitiy
Research project: Moral Agents in the Financial Sector. The Development, Preservation and Dissemination of Moral Norms in the Economy
Subject(s): philosophy

Further information: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10677-015-9565-9

Back to publications list


Headlines

Die Gegenwart der Religion und die Zukunft der Philosophie. Internationale Tagung über und mit Jürgen Habermas

Am 20. und 21. November 2020 fand die Tagung „Gegenwart der Religion - Zukunft der Philosophie. Überlegungen im Anschluss an das jüngste Werk von Jürgen Habermas“ statt. In acht Vorträgen international renommierter Wissenschaftler*innen aus der Philosophie und Theologie wurde an zwei Tagen das 2019 erschienene Werk "Auch eine Geschichte der Philosophie" mit dem Autor Jürgen Habermas diskutiert. Mehr...

Ringvorlesung "Machtverschiebung durch Algorithmen und KI"


Von Suchmaschinen bis hin zu Predictive Policing - Algorithmen und Künstliche Intelligenz verändern gesellschaftliche Strukturen und ökonomische Geschäftsmodelle. In der Ringvorlesung "Machtverschiebung durch Algorithmen und KI" werden ab dem 11. November 2020 gesellschaftliche Auswirkungen und Optionen rechtlicher Regulierung im Zusammenhabng mit KI diskutiert. Mehr...

Upcoming Events

21. Januar 2021, 12 Uhr

Frankfurter Kolloquium für Internetforschung X: Maximilian Becker (Leibniz Universität Hannover): Freiheit zur Rechtswidrigkeit im Internet: Herausforderungen technischer Rechtsdurchsetzung. Mehr...

21. Januar 2021, 18.00 Uhr

13. FFGI Vortragsreihe: Dr. Cinzia Sciuto (Journalistin, Frankfurt): Menschenrechte in einer pluralistischen Gesellschaft. Warum wir mehr Laizität brauchen. Mehr...

22. Januar 2021, 12.30 Uhr

Booklaunch within the Postdoctoral Dialogue Series "Norms, Plurality and Critique": Disasters and Social Reproduction - Crisis Response between the State and Community. Mehr...

-----------------------------------------

Latest Media

Videoarchiv

Weitere Videoaufzeichnungen finden Sie hier...

„Freiwilligkeit oder Zwang?“ – Experimente in den Zeiten von Infektionsschutz

Prof. Dr. Dr. Günter Frankenberg (Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Forschungsverbund "Normative Ordnungen")
Moderation: Prof. Marion Tiedtke (Hochschule für Musik und Darstellende Kunst in Frankfurt am Main)
DenkArt „Der normalisierte Ausnahmezustand“


Kant's Tribunal of Reason. Legal Metaphor and Normativity in the Critique of Pure Reason

Prof. Rainer Forst (Normative Orders, Goethe University), Dr. Jakob Huber (Normative Orders, Goethe University), Dr. Sofie Møller (Normative Orders, Goethe University), Prof. Susan Shell (Boston College), Dr. Martin Sticker (University of Bristol), Prof. Marcus Willaschek (Normative Orders, Goethe University)
Booklaunch within the Postdoctoral Dialogue Series "Norms, Plurality and Critique"

New full-text Publications

Darrel Moellendorf (2020):

Hope and reasons. Normative Orders Working Paper 02/2020. More...

Annette Imhausen (2021):

Sciences and normative orders: perspectives from the earliest sciences. Normative Orders Working Paper 01/2021. More...