Publication details

Pandemic Declarations of the World Health Organization as an Exercise of International Public Authority: The Possible Legal Answers to Frictions Between Legitimacies, Gottingen Journal of International Law, vol. 7, no. 1

Article
Open-Access-Logo
Author(s): Villarreal, Pedro
Year of publication: 2016

Abstract: The institutional decisions regarding the 2009–2010 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic displayed how the World Health Organization’s (WHO) role as the international organization in charge of coordinating the pandemic response amounts to an exercise of authority. Notably, the 11 June, 2009 Pandemic Declaration was grounded in the WHO’s guidelines that do not have a binding nature according to international law. However, this is not an obstacle for considering them as an act of authority, since their effects can constrain the decision-making of States. If these non-binding acts have an authoritative nature, then it is necessary to address various legitimacy issues that may be present. This is where the concept of international public authority (IPA) can prove useful, since it enables to combine the non-binding nature of Pandemic Declarations and the respective guidelines with broad legally-oriented figures such as transparency and accountability. The controversies surrounding the 2009 Pandemic Declaration illustrate how the strictly technical-scientific elements that led to such a decision were not necessarily harmonious with other aspects more related to political decision making in general, such as transparency and accountability. This can be considered as an example of how so-called ‘technocratic legitimacy’ sometimes generates friction with lato sensu ‘political legitimacy’. As the 2009–2010 pandemic period unraveled, it became clear that expertise-based legitimacy is not sufficient in itself to consider the act as generally legitimate. On the contrary, the strongest criticisms directed at the decision-making process of the WHO during this event were leveled against deficits of transparency and accountability. This article purports to discuss the issue of how both types of legitimacies, technical-scientific and political, are necessary components for deeming Pandemic Declarations as legitimate enough, since they amount to an exercise of international public authority.

Keywords: International Public Authority, Pandemic Declarations, World Health Organization

Research area: Research Area 3: The Plurality of Normative Orders: Competition, Overlapping, Interconnection
Research project: The Exercise of Public Authority on the International, Supranational, and Domestic Levels: Reconstructing Public Law to Face the Challenges of Multilevel Governance
Subject(s): law

Full text: http://gojil.eu/issues/71/71_article_villarreal.pdf

Back to publications list


Headlines

Die Gegenwart der Religion und die Zukunft der Philosophie. Internationale Tagung über und mit Jürgen Habermas

Am 20. und 21. November 2020 fand die Tagung „Gegenwart der Religion - Zukunft der Philosophie. Überlegungen im Anschluss an das jüngste Werk von Jürgen Habermas“ statt. In acht Vorträgen international renommierter Wissenschaftler*innen aus der Philosophie und Theologie wurde an zwei Tagen das 2019 erschienene Werk "Auch eine Geschichte der Philosophie" mit dem Autor Jürgen Habermas diskutiert. Mehr...

DenkArt "Solidarität_Aber wie?"


Ab dem 9. März 2021 befasst sich die partizipative Vortragsreihe DenkArt "Solidarität_Aber wie?" mit der Frage, wie Solidarität heute überhaupt noch möglich ist. An insgesamt drei Terminen soll diskutiert werden, was die Gesellschaft gegenwärtig verbindet, wenn Werte strittig werden und soziale Unterschiede sie immer mehr spalten. Mehr...

Upcoming Events

9. März 2021, 19.30 Uhr

DenkArt "Solidarität_Aber wie?": Kübra Gümüşay (Autorin und Bloggerin): Solidarität_Wie ist Teilhabe für alle möglich? Mehr...

18. März 2021, 12 Uhr

Frankfurter Kolloquium für Internetforschung X: Verena Haisch (DLA Piper und Deutscher Juristinnenbund e.V.): Die Rolle des Rechts im Kampf gegen digitale Gewalt gegen Frauen - Theorie vs. Praxis. Mehr...

-----------------------------------------

Latest Media

Videoarchiv

Weitere Videoaufzeichnungen finden Sie hier...

Pandemic Media. Preliminary Notes Toward an Inventory

Laliv Melamed, PhD, Philipp Dominik Keidl, PhD, Prof. Antonio Somaini and Prof. Vinzenz Hediger
Welcome Address by Prof. Rainer Forst
Book lɔ:ntʃ

Machtverschiebung durch Algorithmen – ein Thema für Datenschutz und Antidiskriminierungsrecht?

Prof. Antje von Ungern-Sternberg (Universität Trier)
Ringvorlesung "Machtverschiebung durch Algorithmen und KI"


New full-text Publications

Darrel Moellendorf (2020):

Hope and reasons. Normative Orders Working Paper 02/2020. More...

Annette Imhausen (2021):

Sciences and normative orders: perspectives from the earliest sciences. Normative Orders Working Paper 01/2021. More...